<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Internet: Not Ready For Prime Time</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hollywood-2point0.com/blog/by-brian-giberson/internet-not-ready-for-prime-time/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hollywood-2point0.com/blog/by-brian-giberson/internet-not-ready-for-prime-time</link>
	<description>Musings from a field of falling giants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 19:54:11 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Giberson</title>
		<link>http://hollywood-2point0.com/blog/by-brian-giberson/internet-not-ready-for-prime-time/comment-page-1#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Giberson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 21:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videocinematic.com/?p=178#comment-18</guid>
		<description>My Kardashian collection is safely on DVD.

The concern is that there isn&#039;t sufficient bandwidth in the Internet universe to stream all of the video content that we wish was available. If you believe the pundits, there is a deluge of video content about to get crammed down the pipeline, and wired directly to our TVs in HD. Does the current available bandwidth need to be expanded? I&#039;m sure someone is working on that business, but I&#039;ve never here anyone discuss what the specific bandwidth requirements are for consumers to be watching HD internet videos &quot;en masse.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My Kardashian collection is safely on DVD.</p>
<p>The concern is that there isn&#8217;t sufficient bandwidth in the Internet universe to stream all of the video content that we wish was available. If you believe the pundits, there is a deluge of video content about to get crammed down the pipeline, and wired directly to our TVs in HD. Does the current available bandwidth need to be expanded? I&#8217;m sure someone is working on that business, but I&#8217;ve never here anyone discuss what the specific bandwidth requirements are for consumers to be watching HD internet videos &#8220;en masse.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pizzolo</title>
		<link>http://hollywood-2point0.com/blog/by-brian-giberson/internet-not-ready-for-prime-time/comment-page-1#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Pizzolo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 08:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videocinematic.com/?p=178#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Is this any different from any other networked technology? On September 11th our cellphones stopped working... I imagine for some people, Jacko&#039;s death was a 9/11-esque event (?). Is your concern that in the event of a nuclear attack, we may not be able to watch the Kim Kardashian reality show on Hulu?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this any different from any other networked technology? On September 11th our cellphones stopped working&#8230; I imagine for some people, Jacko&#8217;s death was a 9/11-esque event (?). Is your concern that in the event of a nuclear attack, we may not be able to watch the Kim Kardashian reality show on Hulu?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
