The Curse of A FILM BY…

There’s been a long-running debate on directors taking (demanding?) the “A Film By” credit on movie key art. I’m kind of indifferent to it. I personally don’t take the credit but that’s just me… hell, I’d prefer all my work be anonymous if I could effectively produce & market that way. So I don’t have a dog in this race, but I do have a unique observation on the whole thing…

At Halo-8, we’ll put the A FILM BY credit [henceforth I'll refer to it as AFB] on the key art if a filmmaker wants it there, so we have a handful of release with the credit. Now, I hate to do this because I don’t want everybody checking key art to figure out other filmmakers’ sales etc, but it’s interesting… our films with the AFB credit are our lowest selling DVDs. Consistently. It’s so fucking weird. They range in content and marketability, but for some reason if that AFB credit is there it dooms the release.

I do NOT want to villify or judge the filmmakers, so I don’t know how much to weigh in on this… but my gut is that a filmmaker who wants that credit has an overall filmmaking ideology that might make the rest of the team less apt to feel ownership of the film and want to help promote it. That may or may not be a big deal on a studio level, but for an indie release that feeling of camaraderie and collaborative-ownership is critical. Or maybe it’s totally coincidental. I sincerely have no clue. I don’t feel comfortable getting super analytical on this one (at least not in public haha), but I thought it was interesting enough to mention.

I’m really curious what everyone else thinks.

[FULL DISCLOSURE: I did once take the AFB credit sort of (and probably cursed myself in the process). I always referred to THREAT as "A Kings Mob Production" and used that term where the AFB credit would otherwise go. When Queque and Killili were making the first THREAT postcard, they asked me about it and I said it should be "A Kings Mob Production." Q&K made the argument that if Kings Mob is a creative collective where everyone eventually helms their own project (the dream that was never realized), then the key art should represent both by saying "A Kings Mob Production" as well as, for example, "A film by Matt Pizzolo." Besides seeing their point as valid in terms of accountability and also allowing the collective to have two levels of ownership to identify the team as well as the project's primary creative force, I also agreed to it because I was incredibly frustrated that press was constantly referring to it as "Matt Pizzolo's THREAT" just because I was the director... but in fairness if it wasn't "Kings Mob's THREAT" and if they insisted on personalizing it then Katie should certainly have the same level of ownership I did, so I suggested "A film by Katie Nisa & Matt Pizzolo" (alphabetical order). I later pulled the credit entirely when the movie finally came out. Now... if that didn't just completely bore the shit out of you, I'd be happy to spend a few pages detailing my neurotic process of dealing with THREAT's opening title cards. Ugh. Credits are stupid.]